Greyfriars Bobby says “bite me”

Seeds of Our Demise 3 Comments »

When they came for the dogs, I said nothing, because I owned two cats…

Seriously, could this be the point of no return in Blighty? As long as they kept to questions of human behavior the Muslims were safe, because the British have made one-upmanship on bending over backwards to prove they are the most polite nation in the world a national sport. But now Muslims are attacking not only dogs — which many residents of the sceptered isles love more than their own mothers — but Scottish dogs. You know, it’s time the Scots remembered they aren’t English — and aren’t famous for being polite.* And the English thereby might remember the Saxon component in their own makeup… (I base this not on the standard weak-kneed response from the police constabulary, but from the comments to the article, which so far are 100% behind the dog.)

Via Kathy Shaidle.

*I had this sentence in my entry last night and somehow in editing and correcting my spelling etc. it disappeared! I told you I was tired…

Oh great I live in a city of freaks

Seeds of Our Demise 6 Comments »

Vandals spray-painted “Obama Smokes Crack” and other hate messages on 60 city vehicles parked across the street from City Hall in downtown Orlando.

Via.

Mama said knock you out

Seeds of Our Demise 4 Comments »

Then, madam, I suggest that you start building that basement holding cell, and invest in some arm and leg chains. Because although I am myself childless I have observed enough of life to be pretty sure that when most boys grow to maturity they do whatever they goddamn well please. So get crackin’ on that brainwashing already.

Missing the point

Seeds of Our Demise 3 Comments »

Dude! Because evil is more fun!

(Via.)

Not Happening

Seeds of Our Demise 14 Comments »

Charles Austin points out the main reason why I have no interest in ever seeing M. Night Shyamalan’s newest movie, The Happening: the extremely irritating emphasis in its adverts on the fact that it’s his “first R-rated movie OMG!” My response to this is, “So?” Since I can’t see what’s so scary about the actual movie itself, at least based on the trailers, I can only assume that its R-rating is, as Charles says, just a marketing ploy, and that in order to get it they probably just added a couple of extra blood-bags and maybe a shot of some girl’s tits to the final release.

Update: okay, having read the reviews, apparently they blood-bags are the ratings-getter. Oh yeah, and the cause? Can you say Revenge of the Killer Weeds? I knew you could. Oh I’m sorry, did I spoil it? My bad. Consider it my little service to those who might otherwise have been compelled to spend their hard-earned dough in the theaters on this. You should instead maybe go see the latest Hulk movie, which I don’t have to spoil, because everyone knows the plots of all Hulk stories: Hulk smash! Hulk — I mean Banner — kiss pretty girl! Hulk fight and smash some more! Hulk win! Banner runs away to smash another day… This past week the Scifi channel had the old Hulk series on, and I tried to watch it, even though it had never been my particular favorite (I never really liked superhero comics anyway), but I just couldn’t, even though one of the episodes had a young, pre-Sherlock-Holmes Jeremy Brett as the villain. 1970s tv was so cheesy.

Grammar Bitch goes obscure — because she can

Parallel Worlds, Seeds of Our Demise 8 Comments »

Hey, I’m Grammar Bitch, not Grammar Trying-To-Be-Nice-About-It… Anyway, a common (because little known and thus little corrected) grammar mistake once more crops up: the use of “discreet” (which means “maintaining silence about something of a delicate nature” — def. further here) when what is meant is “discrete” (a word that means “apart or detached from others; separate; distinct“). Now, since the words are spelled almost the same, I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt (especially since the blogger in question is a Real Writer and so one assumes actually knows which word is which) and put this down to a simple typo, but it still drives me nuts, and makes me wish that people would just use one of the handy other words that mean the same thing. That’s what English does best — it provides us with choice, wonderful choice: multiple words for single concepts.

Speaking of failure to take advantage of our mother tongue, I hereby accuse the current run of Doctor Who of abusing the word “clever.” The show’s writers seem to think the word is just about the only one that exists to describe genius-level intelligence, when in fact “clever” is only supposed to refer to someone who is simply brighter than average. (A full definition can be found here.) In fact, a certain level of canniness — or “street-wised-ness,” if you will — is implied in the definition of clever, and it’s common knowledge that genius-level intelligence does not necessarily include this component. Many geniuses are in fact quite “unworldly,” to put it discreetly (heh), and the stereotype of the nutty professor didn’t come out of nowhere.

Also, the show undercuts its conception of geniuses as being “clever” in just about every episode that features a character that is supposed to be smart (in other words, just about every show), because invariably the “genius” in the episode does something, or a number of somethings, that no truly clever person would attempt. For example, in the two-parter “The Sontaran Stratagem/The Poison Sky” Luke Rattigan, the child genius character, rants about how much more “clever” he is than everyone else in a scene wherein he has just revealed that he has in fact been completely stupid about how his protegés would react to his bizarre plans. (On a side note, a drinking game on how often the word “clever” appears in these episodes would cause liver failure — I was almost surprised that the the Doctor referred to Luke’s school as a school for “geniuses” instead of “clever people.”) And the Doctor’s own grasp on common sense (which no true clever person can be without) often seems shaky, though he could be excused since he is, after all, an alien, and common sense for him might not be quite that of other people. But really, someone needs to send a memo to the writing staff of Doctor Who to let them know that words and phrases such as “smart” and “intelligent” are still at use among English speakers and they aren’t too difficult for the kiddies who watch the show to grasp, though I don’t know about the writers themselves.

“Clever” shows up on the episode I saw tonight, “The Unicorn and the Wasp,” though only once, I believe, so I don’t have to time my wine sips. Harder to accept is the assertion that Agatha Christie is apparently the greatest British mystery writer of all time, though I can accept she’s one of the most popular, and I can even believe that her works will last for ages beyond her time, though maybe not to the year 5 billion. Personally, though I enjoyed her books when I read them, I only read them once or at most twice. To tell the truth her stories left me a bit cold. On the other hand, I’ve read the mystery novels of her contemporary, Dorothy Sayers, countless times. But that’s just me. I have the feeling that Ms. Sayers’ works are rather beyond the folks who write for the BBC these days, and also she might be too uncomfortably theological for Mr. Davies and crew (in lieu of spoilers let’s just say it’s no surprise who is the most dastardly character in tonight’s episode).

Still, “The Unicorn and the Wasp” wasn’t bad, serving as a bit of fun fluff between the more serious eps of “The Doctor’s Daughter” (review coming up some day) and the following episode which is set on my dream planet (a giant haunted library — awesome, can’t wait, etc.). Fenella Woolgar (sp? too lazy to check names) was suitably homely/smart as the Agatha Christie, and all the other characters conformed completely to the British drawing room murder mystery as intended. The stuff about “we’re British, we carry on” got really tiresome, mostly because I don’t feel it’s a sentiment worth mocking as apparently the show’s writers and directors do, but I liked the way Donna — unlike all his other companions, at least in this incarnation of the series — ignored the Doctor’s admonishments to not attempt the slang of the time and stubbornly kept on using it.

More coming up! Including a review of “The Doctor’s Daughter,” which I am sure you are all (all three of you) waiting for with bated breath.

Movers ‘N’ Shakers

Seeds of Our Demise 7 Comments »

There’s another Starbucks controversy a-brewin’. Oh, that’s bad, I know. Anyway, it surprises me that drinking Starbucks coffee is still considered an activity that confers status in New York City, of all places. Here in little old Orlando Starbucks is just considered a chain, where the lumpenprole congregate. Well, the average office worker, anyway. To find the pretentious crowd you have to go to one of our several independent coffee houses.

As for me, I drink Starbucks on those occasions when I feel like (and can afford) a fancy drink, like a vanilla latte or something. And also they occasionally have cool mugs. But otherwise I drink coffee at home.

Gooey

Seeds of Our Demise 6 Comments »

Before I clicked on the link, I knew that this load of puling mush had been written by Mark Morford.

The Return of Grammar Bitch

Seeds of Our Demise 11 Comments »

Because I am seeing this all over the place: the usage of “taught,” which is the past tense of the verb “to teach,” when the writer meant to use the adjective “taut.” For God’s sakes, don’t make me come over there and hit you with a dictionary. They are two totally different words despite being pronounced the same. I’m not even going to bother putting links to definitions — look it up yourselves.

The Church of England continues to become more and more pathetic

Seeds of Our Demise 11 Comments »

Or, How To Ruin An Entertaining TV Show… Desperately grasping at any straw to fill their increasingly echoing and irrelevant churches, C of E vicars are now raiding the television sci-fi cupboard in an effort to “reach” young people. I say this as a fan of Doctor Who: if I was a member of this or any church that decided to use said series as a “teaching aid” I would have been totally turned off from not only the church lessons but probably the show to boot. It would ruin the enjoyment of the show for me, the way dissecting novels has ruined the ability of generations of English majors to be able to simply read a book. Of course, I was an odd child, who was always repulsed rather than flattered by the attempts of my elders to patronizingly talk down to what they supposed was my level in order to “reach” me. The sight of an over-thirty trying to be “hip” and “cool” and speak contemporary teenage slang struck me then as now as clumsy and farcical, not to mention insulting. It’s as if they were saying “you youngsters are too dumb to understand grown-up subjects, and also we can’t be bothered to actually help you overcome your youthful ignorance, so we’ll treat you the way the cliché missionary treats the simple Stone Age cannibals and speak to you in Pidgin.” Then the cannibals boil them and eat their heads — or in the case of contemporary Western society, the adults cannibalize their own culture until everyone is the equivalent of a person with no head, or at least no brain.

And on a side note, the so-called “Christian symbolism” that all too often leaks into, or in many cases has been clumsily dropped into, science fiction series, films, and novels is one thing that has always tempered my enjoyment of the genre. Since most science fiction writers, at least in television and film, are liberal and secular in outlook the result almost invariably comes off as a cynical attempt to hijack Christian beliefs to something I call the idea of Cooler Jesus. For instance, how much cooler a Jesus is a cute time-traveling alien guy in tight pants than that boring old bearded guy in the robes on your grandma’s kitchen wall? Or worse, that bleeding guy stuck by nails to a piece of wood, what a downer! And Cooler Jesus is also tolerant of gays and disapproves of guns, and he’ll take you for a spin in his time machine if you’re a reasonably good-looking humanoid girl, so take that, Christians! You know, I think David Tennant is hot, but he’s not the Messiah.

(Via the Flea.)